Why did the Democrat majority vote against the unemployment extension in the House today?
Question by Baroccoli: Why did the Democrat majority vote against the unemployment extension in the House today?
http://www.examiner.com/business-headlines-in-providence/unemployment-extension-denied-house-votes-against-extended-jobless-benefits
Are they upset because they were voted out of power?
“iwasnot….” I’m not buying the whol “republicans blocked it” crap. Didn’t stop democrats from pushing Obamacare through without even one single Republican vote.
Best answer:
Answer by Cris Ray
2 years is enough there has to be a end .
Give your answer to this question below!
Popular Posts:
- Stocks Posting Sharp Losses In Early Afternoon Trading – U.S. Commentary
- TIer 5 Unemployment Extension Update 05/15/2010
- How does one qualify to receive the FED-ED unemployment insurance extension in California?
- NCESC Unemployment Benefits – www.ncesc.com « Breaking News
- How can i get money?I am a jobless person and don’t have any source of income with me.?


Interesting strategy by the Democrats, bringing the bill up with a procedure that required a 2/3 majority to pass, so it would be sure to fail.
Not enough people signed up for the 99ers Union.
Three main reasons
1) Apples grow on trees
2) You can’t divide by zero
3) Spartan Equals practiced homosexual pedophilia
You clearly did not read the source you cited. You must have missed this important part:
“Republicans in the House blocked the unemployment extension bill that is an extension of a the bill passed in July. Those benefits will expire on December 1 and if they aren’t renewed, approximately two million people will lose benefits by the end of December.
According to MSNBC, Democrats brought the measure to the floor under a rule that required a two-thirds vote to pass, so the measure fell despite winning a 258-154 majority. Republicans blasted the move since it denied them an opportunity to try to offset its cost.”
So you are not being truthful in your question. Shame on you.
They are deficit hawks
Politics to make the Republican look bad, but I don’t think the extension should pass. In california, we have a high unemployment rate, but there are a lot of low paying jobs people refuse to do. We need to fill those jobs before extending unemployment.
This is terrible news for the jobless. BUT “the Democrat majority” didn’t actually vote against the measure.
Anyone who checks your web link will see that the measure passed on a majority vote basis, but for some reason it was sent to the floor under a rule requiting a 2/3 vote.
I don’t know why the Dem leadership would send it to the floor under a rule requiring a 2/3 vote. But the “Democrat majority” actually didn’t vote against it.
Republicans in the House blocked the unemployment extension bill that is an extension of a the bill passed in July. Those benefits will expire on December 1 and if they aren’t renewed, approximately two million people will lose benefits by the end of December.
Read your own source please the Reps did this.
Beacause this is an appropriations bill, they really only needed a simple majority of 50%. The democrats pulled a switch, requiring a 60% vote, and it still won. Note that they did the opposite on ObamaCare, that should have required a 60% vote, but they skirted the rules by pretending ObamaCare was just an appropriations bill so they only needed 50%.
Anyway, the Republicans would have been for the extension, but they wanted to use up the unspent TARP money. The dems wanted to keep that stash, in case they needed to buy the votes of a Louisiana or Nebraska senator, as they did on ObamaCare.
Anyway, all’s well that ends well. All those unemployed people will now be asing JOBS, not handouts, and the Dems will have to get on board. Cut the taxes, quit spending, and put America back to work.
It was brought to the floor under a rule that required 2/3 vote to pass and with voting along party lines it failed. They might bring it up again under a rule that only requires 50% vote. This was probably done to remind some voters where their butter comes from.
Republicans in the House Thursday blocked a bill that would have extended jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed beyond the holiday season.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101118/ap_on_bi_ge/us_jobless_benefits
Care to rephrase your question?
want it and have it both ways
no UNFUNDED bennies that we cant afford (no cuts among 2-5,000,000,,,,,,no more spendin w/o cuts)
sorry folks (constituent party loyalists) we tried,,,,,,them nasty repubkekins want folks to starve and
freeze this winter,,,,they cold
Has anyone ever noticed that, especially during the holiday season, when we are all called upon to “give” or to “help out the poor”, you never see a story in the news of someone HELPING THEMSELVES instead? I submit as the greatest example of “over-reliance on the government” is Hurricane Katrina’s Aftermath and the signs “Please Help Us”. Did anyone think of stealing water, food, or even a BOAT while they were heisting those electronic goods? And, if as some would claim, they were “too poor to leave”, who made them that way? Similarly, I believe a lot of “unemployed” are made up of people who just won’t work at a lower job which does not pay “their worth” while that unemployment check pays more! Need a job? Walmart, Toys are Us, target, etc, are hiring, even in Nevada! Choice #2: JOIN THE MILITARY!
Funny how they are saying “republicans blocked it” when they could have easily passed it without republican help.
The Right sounding Bill can be filled with bad stuff, that’s what got us into this in the 1st place,
Consider that HB xxx is called “The save America from Itself” bill, a bill introduced by the Far right/left but has provisions tacked on by the Extreme left/right to make almost every provision useless and impossible to comply with. Who would vote for that? examples are multitudinal of bills authored by well meaning Patriots who re read the final version and couldn’t sign what they thought they wrote.
Because it was unfunded .. What oh what were they thinking ??? Give me the pen ..
12.5 Billion to extend it to Feb. Holly Molly we ain’t got the money. It is x-mas time and I see help wanted signs everywhere. Why do they not apply for work now.
At this time, Senate Democrats do not have a plan to bring the jobless measure up as a stand-alone bill. Renewing benefits, however, may be a part of other negotiations with regard to taxes and other end-of-year legislation.
Remember the Republicans do not have the majority yet. The Dem’s did a 2/3 thingy because rather than a 50/50 just to make a point that the Democrats will spend us into oblivion and the Republicans are heartless. Don’t you just love political manipulation. How could the Rep. be for a bill that was not even a straight up or down vote if other things would be added that haven’t been mentioned yet. See how the Dem’s think we are stupid.
even they know all good things like the gravy train must come to an end and it has, finally, they are also not pleased with the election results and made their contempt known