Social Connection
If the economy is so awesome under Obama, why is the government revizing down 824,000 jobs for jobless claims?
March 17th, 2011 | 
Author:
Question by libs are morons: If the economy is so awesome under Obama, why is the government revizing down 824,000 jobs for jobless claims?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aNSc0oQ0vb4M&pos=10
How do you lose track of 824,000 jobs? Is this a sign of continued economy “hope and change” when we find out that the economy is even worse than we thought?
Best answer:
Answer by Hector O
lol no one said the economy was awesome not even obama lol
What do you think? Answer below!
Popular Posts:
- Stocks Posting Sharp Losses In Early Afternoon Trading – U.S. Commentary
- TIer 5 Unemployment Extension Update 05/15/2010
- How does one qualify to receive the FED-ED unemployment insurance extension in California?
- NCESC Unemployment Benefits – www.ncesc.com « Breaking News
- How can i get money?I am a jobless person and don’t have any source of income with me.?
Tags:
google.com
Anyone that thinks the president controls jobs or the economy is a moron.
The economy is not fine at all Clinton messed things up by forcing banks to give loans to people who could not afford it (mostly to blacks). Bush did nothing about the problem and spent too much money. Now Obama is spending even more on pork and trying to turn this country into a muslim communism. Obama is the worst thing to happen to this country since Jimmy Carter.
IT’s not awesome. It got the way it is because of problems cause by lack of regulation. And what party is against regulation? Oh right, the REPUBLICANS!!!!!
_Thanks for playing try again.
the GOP is doing this, it is not Obama, or if anything it is Bush’s fault
uh….they are talking about employement data they collected LAST YEAR…and they are revising it.
Why would you post an article without even reading it yourself ???…..omg ! FAIL !
“The revised numbers are from April 2008 to March 2009″
READ THE F’n LINK BEFORE YOU POST…you look like a damn fool, and so do the little clowns who thumb’d me down for pointing out your mistake !
See STEVE D’s post for further humiliation….
The economy is not worse than we thought.
Those of us who live in the real world, know that it is bad.
The boobs that have been seeing everything through rose colored glasses are now coming to the realization that no matter how you spin it-it’s not getting better.
they are playing a numbers game for propaganda but its good because “why would you be against lying to help the economy ”
*my God O-bots are in for a big surprise
Real unemployment is at 17% and will continue to go higher. The government cant steal from those who earn it and create nearly as many jobs at $ 100,000/temporary job.
THAT IS TOO FUNNY!!
YOU DID NOT READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AND THE LINK
The revised numbers are from April 2008 to March 2009
They’re using the same “math” that said his healthcare plan would save billions.
The president has no control over the economy, and if you think he does or want him to do a better job at controlling it than your just asking for Socialism. I really don’t get it how cons like you are against Socialism but are bashing Obama at the same time because his Socialist ideals of fixing the economy aren’t good enough.
Bold indeed my friend.
I don’t suppose you bothered to read the attached explanation (you can find it here: http://www.bloomberg.com/insight/birth-death-model.html )
It would have been 2,824,000 jobs had our glorious dear leader not “saved or created” 2 million jobs with his glorious spending of other people’s money. Do you believe that?
Yep.
You still lost.
It’s supposed to taste like crap tacos.
Oh – and posting a link that contradicts your claims – classic epic fail!
I disagree with the first claim, and I am happy that you gave some factual evidence to support your proposition. All Obama knows to do is campaign, he has no idea to fix an economy, only knows how to answer easy questions and read off a teleprompter.
Wait a minute!!
OH, now I get it, these are the jobs 0bama saved? Until LATER to add to the official figures?
You really can’t trust this bunch to tell the truth about anything they touch. Even when the figures are ‘really posted’ it’s still jacked up to make the figures look better than they really are. Since the TRUE unemployment numbers are just over 17% http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/04/real-unemployment-17-2-percent-mint/ they really want to keep that out of sight.
Revisions are normal. Unemployment numbers are always in flux. It’s usually expected to get revised numbers.
Yeah, but more jobs would have been lost if it wasn’t for Obama. …lol “Give him more time” they say. Would that be their next campaign slogan?
Since there is no actual way of tracking jobs lost and gained any figure is suspect. Good luck to you